50 Shades of Grey debate....some sanity in a feminist perspective
50 Shades of Grey – from http://www.hercircleezine.com/2012/05/02/anti-feminist-ideals-in-fifty-shades-of-grey/
“These books tell women that they want not only to be
objectified, their bodies ravaged by objects and men for whom they will attach
themselves to the rack to please, but also that they want to be dominated—in
the bedroom and outside of it. It’s pornography in its purest form, and
pornography thrives because men demand it. In this case, both Meyer and James
are helping to the contribution of it, enabling the industry and patriarchy,
and indoctrinating the idea that women want to be subjugated for the sake of
love. One mom said to me, “This book has saved my marriage,” which proves that
women now must bring handcuffs to the bedroom and assume the submissive and
servile position in bed to keep the romance alive in their marriage. These
books are not helping us form our own identities as women, or helping us locate
our own sexual desires exclusive to what pleases men in bed…. Meyer and James
have successfully “turned” the mainstream female reader into the housewife who
can only save her marriage by putting on a school uniform while being
handcuffed to a rack. There is nothing feminist in this. There is nothing
empowering or progressive about these women writers, who reinforce
stereotypical ideals of womanhood, and it is sad that we [not me!] are buying
into it."
Posted by Pam Patterson
Posted by Pam Patterson